Decision on the Right to Legal Counsel in Pre-Trial Detention (Maslov Case)

Overview

Judgment No. 11-P (2000), known as the Maslov Case, established that any person subjected to state coercive measures or interrogation has an immediate constitutional right to access legal counsel from the exact moment of physical detention.

Facts

Citizen O.V. Maslov was detained by law enforcement officers and subjected to operational questioning and search procedures without being formally charged or allowed to contact a defense lawyer. Investigators argued that statutory procedural rules permitted denying access to an attorney until formal criminal charges or arrest warrants were issued. Maslov filed a constitutional complaint challenging the delay in providing defense counsel.

Legal Issue

Right to assistance of counsel from moment of initial detention

Evidence

Police detention protocols, interrogation logs, pre-trial detention records, and constitutional complaint petitions.

Arguments

Maslov argued that denying immediate access to legal counsel violated Article 48(2) of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to legal assistance for anyone detained or accused. State authorities argued that early operational questioning before formal charging did not require attorney presence.

Judgment

The Constitutional Court ruled in favor of Maslov, declaring statutory restrictions delaying access to defense counsel unconstitutional.

Court's Reasoning

The Court held that the constitutional right to legal counsel under Article 48 applies not merely to formally designated suspects or defendants, but to any individual whose rights or freedoms are actually restricted by state authorities (e.g., physical detention, questioning, or search).

Rule / Principle Established

Mandated immediate access to defense counsel from the moment of actual physical detention, directly influencing the drafting of the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code (UK-RF).

Significance

Mandated immediate access to defense counsel from the moment of actual physical detention, directly influencing the drafting of the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code (UK-RF).

Beyond borders

Comparative legal analysis

Comparative analysis has not yet been prepared for this case. Request one below.

Request comparative analysis

Ask the editorial team to read this judgment against another legal system.

Sources & references

• Decision on the Right to Legal Counsel in Pre-Trial Detention (Maslov Case), Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (2000)